Izraeli Lapszemle
BreuerPress
HEADLINES FROM THE IZRAELI HEBREW PRESS HA’ARETZ 2. INSTEAD OF LAW THAT WAS INVALIDATED: STATE INITIATING IMPRISONMENT OF MIGRANTS FOR 1.5 YEARS 3. DERI ON SUPPORT FOR LEON [IN JERUSALEM MAYORAL RACE]: „HOPING THAT LIBERMAN WILL HELP US BREAK UP THE GOVERNMENT” MA’ARIV 2. STATE COMPTROLLER: TENS OF BILLIONS OF SHEKELS THAT WERE DISTRIBUTED TO GIANT COMPANIES – WITHOUT RESTRICTIONS AND WITHOUT FOLLOW-UP YEDIOT AHRONOT YISRAEL HAYOM 2. NO SURPRISES: IRAN REFUSES TO ALLOW IAEA INSPECTORS TO MAKE SURPRISE VISITS TO ITS NUCLEAR FACILITIES WALLA! NANA10 [Headlines for Walla! and Nana10 are from their websites as of 10:45.] ______________________________ SUMMARY OF OP-EDS FROM THE HEBREW PRESS Yediot Ahronot asserts that the assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin<mfa.gov.il/MFA/AboutIsrael/History/Pages/Yitzhak%20Rabin%201922-1995.aspx > (which occurred on the 12th of the Hebrew month of Chesvan, today on the civil calendar this year), „seared into Israeli society the awareness of the cost that internal debates threaten to claim,” and also, „taught us that there is no substitute for conducting and deciding controversies in the framework of the law and without violence.” The author opposes both, „the waves of attempts to exploit the murder,” as well as, „the waves of attempts to deny its severity.” Two papers discuss the controversy regarding planned dismissals at Teva Pharmaceutical Industries in light of the substantial grants and tax breaks it has received over the years: Ma’ariv suggests that while business decisions are Teva’s to make, it should set a personal example by cutting bonuses, expenses and salaries for senior managers and look to enact other cost-cutting and efficiency measures before dismissing workers. The author calls on the government, „to tell Teva and other companies that they are firing workers only because they have no choice, not because of the bottom line or concern over future revenues.” Yisrael Hayom calls for doing away with , „the excessive benefits for anyone willing to invest here,” because, „Israel, as it becomes more established, more stable and is considered to pose a lower security risk, will continue to attract investors.” The author concludes with the hope that, „In the future, we must wean investors away from the unnecessary dowries; they will come without it.” |