Summary of editorials from the Hebrew press
BreuerPress
Yediot Aharonot suggests that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s belief that his situation is not so dire „stands on three legs: The first is the military and political exhaustion of the rebels, who suffer from poor logistical support. The second leg is the outside elements that have assisted the rebels: Neither the Turks, nor the Americans, nor the Sunni world and certainly not Israel have assisted the rebels in a way that could change the picture. The third leg is the economic and military aid that Assad is receiving from Hezbollah, Iran and especially the Russians.” The author contends that Assad is also trying to bolster his image by jabbing at Israel, but adds that he must be careful lest he go too far „and be buried by the Israeli response.” The paper believes that „Israel’s true problem is the strategic weaponry,” which also potentially threatens other countries, and concludes: „Israel needs to do what it needs to do, wi th all the risks involved, and let others lead in the political arena.”
Yisrael Hayom discusses media reports on the recommendations of the Peri committee on greater equality in sharing the burden of military service and says that it „has proposed the minimum necessary to save the honor of the political establishment.” However, the author suggests that elements in both Yisrael Beytenu and the Jewish Home are expressing reservations over the Peri recommendations, ostensibly over its failure to provide for national service for Israeli Arabs, but really because they are interested in preserving good relations with the ultra-orthodox parties. The paper believes that the Likud, and even elements in Labor, have been largely silent on the issue for the same reason and concludes that if the aforesaid minimum cannot be implemented, „Then everyone, coalition and opposition, deserve a vote of no-confidence.”
The Jerusalem Post approves of the pending bill that would prohibit strikes at
ports, the Israel Electric Corporation and other essential services, and asserts: “The very threat by the strategically situated few to harm the general population is inherently unconscionable.” The editor declares: “Considering the vulnerable state of our economy, sabotage from within cannot be tolerated,” and concludes: “It is time ordinary citizens were granted protection from the ambitious whims of union chieftains.”